<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> <META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7652.24"> <TITLE>RE: [address-policy-wg] 2009-08</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY>  Can I just ask for clarification of the following: "the LIR must demonstrate the unique routing requirements for the PI assignment." and "The LIR must return the IPv6 PI assignment within a period of six months should the unique routing requirements for the PI assignment no longer be met." 1. does this mean that the following question from RIPE-468 is no longer valid for routing? "% Is the End User requesting extra address space for routing and/or % administrative reasons? (Yes/No)" 2. Will this include the space not being routed at all? or does this require that the space be routed? Regards, Dave. ------------------------------------------------ David Freedman Group Network Engineering Claranet Limited <A HREF="http://www.clara.net">http://www.clara.net</A> -----Original Message----- From: address-policy-wg-admin@ripe.net on behalf of Frederic Sent: Mon 6/8/2009 20:07 To: address-policy-wg@ripe.net Subject: [address-policy-wg] 2009-08 hi, we support this proposal. <A HREF="http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2009-08.html">http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2009-08.html</A> bst regards. Frederic </BODY> </HTML>