<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7652.24">
<TITLE>RE: [address-policy-wg] Re: 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P><FONT SIZE=2>agree<BR>
<BR>
------------------------------------------------<BR>
David Freedman<BR>
Group Network Engineering<BR>
Claranet Limited<BR>
<A HREF="http://www.clara.net">http://www.clara.net</A><BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: address-policy-wg-admin@ripe.net on behalf of Daniel Roesen<BR>
Sent: Wed 5/27/2009 10:05<BR>
To: address-policy-wg@ripe.net<BR>
Subject: [address-policy-wg] Re: 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)<BR>
<BR>
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 04:30:34PM +0200, Filiz Yilmaz wrote:<BR>
> PDP Number: 2009-06<BR>
> Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy<BR>
><BR>
> <A HREF="http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2009-06.html">http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2009-06.html</A><BR>
<BR>
I fully support this proposal.<BR>
<BR>
Best regards,<BR>
Daniel<BR>
<BR>
--<BR>
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr@cluenet.de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>