<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> Isn't space allocated to an LIR PA by definition? Eliot On 2/10/09 9:12 AM, IP-Office KPN wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:C5A791BCAA44DD4EBC75ED5F18999A1102E2F8FD@OTSGV003V3.OTS" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">All, I might have missed some of the discussion and emails - in that case my sincere apologies -, but I couldn't find the answer in my archive, so here's my question: </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">To qualify for IPv6 PI address space, an organisation must: a) not be an LIR </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""> What is the rationale behind this? That LIRs do not need IPv6 PI address space? For as I read this, a LIR can never requeste for and receive an IPv6 PI address space. Is this what is meant here? With kind regards, Andries Hettema IP-Office KPN Internet +31 70 45 13398 <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:ip-office@kpn.com">ip-office@kpn.com</a> -----Original Message----- From: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:address-policy-wg-admin@ripe.net">address-policy-wg-admin@ripe.net</a> [<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:address-policy-wg-admin@ripe.net">mailto:address-policy-wg-admin@ripe.net</a>] On Behalf Of Filiz Yilmaz Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 5:35 PM To: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:policy-announce@ripe.net">policy-announce@ripe.net</a> Cc: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:address-policy-wg@ripe.net">address-policy-wg@ripe.net</a> Subject: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 New Draft Document Published (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations) PDP Number: 2006-01 Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations Dear Colleagues, The text of the policy proposal 2006-01 has been revised based on the community feedback. We have published the new version (version 5.0) today. The draft document for the proposal has also been published as well as the impact analysis that was conducted for this proposal. You can find the full proposal at: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2006-01.html">http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2006-01.html</a> and the draft document at: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.ripe.net/ripe/draft-documents/ripe-421-draft2006-01-v5.html">http://www.ripe.net/ripe/draft-documents/ripe-421-draft2006-01-v5.html</a> We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments to <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:address-policy-wg@ripe.net">address-policy-wg@ripe.net</a> before 9 March 2009. Regards Filiz Yilmaz Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC ________________________________________________________________________ ______________ This inbound message to KPN has been checked for all known viruses by KPN MailScan, powered by MessageLabs. For further information visit: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.kpn.com">http://www.kpn.com</a>, keyword 'Mailscan' ________________________________________________________________________ ______________ </pre> </blockquote> </body> </html>