<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"> <head> <meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> <meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)"> <style>  </style> </head> <body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple> <div class=Section1> [ This email is *not* about 2007-08 but something else that crossed my mind, expect a revised 2007-08 soon ]<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Dear all,<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> I want to hear your feedback on an idea that I’ve been playing with for a while – it has to do with the way the RIR allocates blocks of space to an approved IPv4 PA allocation request.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Currently that’s very simple. Once the request is approved for, say, a /15, you get a single routable block of space, a /15. But what do we do when the RIR does not have that size block anymore? Allocate multiple blocks to that request (so, for example, 2 /17s, 1 /18, 5 /19s and 2 /20s)? <o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> What I would suggest is that we set into policy that the RIR, in cases like this, allocates a single best-fit routable block of IPv4 space. So, if the request is for a /12 and the biggest block the RIR has left is a /14, you get a /14. The rationale behind this is quite simple: the requester is not going to be happy to get a bunch of /24s from all over the swamp space to fill his request, and at the same time we remove the risk that a single request is able to wipe out the entire RIR reserves. Smaller requests can still be fulfilled and the LIRs that need more space simply need to come back more often – the 80% usage rule still applies.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> As long as the RIR has a supply from IANA, this rule will have no operational impact as far as I can see.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> I’m hesitant whether we should apply this to PI requests as well – I’d say yes but that does have an impact on the way we’re currently handling that…<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Let me know what you think.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Best,<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Remco<o:p></o:p> </div> <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p> Any opinions expressed in the email are those of the individual and not necessarily of the company. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient and do not constitute an offer or acceptance by Equinix, Inc., Equinix Europe Ltd or any of their group entities to buy or sell any products or services in any jurisdiction. If you have received this email in error please delete this email immediately and notify the IT manager. This communication is sent on behalf of one of the European entities in the Equinix, Inc. Group. The ultimate holding company in Europe is Equinix Europe Ltd whose registered address is Quadrant House, Floor 6, 17 Thomas More Street, Thomas More Square, London E1W 1YW and the Company's registered number is 6293383. The registration details of other Group entities are available at <A title=http://www.eu.equinix.com/ href="http://www.eu.equinix.com">www.eu.equinix.com</A> <o:p></o:p> </o:p> </body> </html>