This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Updated Approach to IPv6 Transfer Requests
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Updated Approach to IPv6 Transfer Requests
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE Policy document updated “IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment Policies for the RIPE NCC Service Region” (ripe-826)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Wed Jun 19 13:33:14 CEST 2024
Hi Marco, > Thank you for your question. > > That is correct, our primary focus will be on supporting the transfers of successfully deployed IPv6 networks. At the same time, we will evaluate requests for allocation transfers without live networks as if they were new requests submitted directly to the RIPE NCC. > > This aligns closely with the intent of policy proposal 2014-12, "Allow IPv6 Transfers," which aimed to accommodate consolidations between related companies or the acquisition of active networks from a business partner without requiring companies to redo their IPv6 implementations. [1] > > If the status of existing IPv6 allocation(s) in the receiving LIR's account would be unclear, we might take the opportunity to clarify this as well. > > I hope this answers your question. Thank you, just making sure the intention is clear and explicitly documented / archived for future reference ;) Cheers! Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Updated Approach to IPv6 Transfer Requests
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE Policy document updated “IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment Policies for the RIPE NCC Service Region” (ripe-826)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]