This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Reducing IXP IPv4 assignment default size to a /26
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Extend Review Phase for 2023-04 - "Add AGGREGATED-BY-LIR status for IPv4 PA assignments"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE Code of Conduct and discussion on this list
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net
Thu Jan 11 12:05:50 CET 2024
On Tue, Sep 5, 2023, at 15:43, Viacheslav Adamanov wrote:
> The problem with ipv4 network speculation for IXP is exaggerated. RIPE
> NCC forbids transferring this networks to another company.
>
> Have there been cases of transmission of such networks?
Late to the show, but yes, there are such cases ("transmission" of an IXP, blocks included).
--
Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Extend Review Phase for 2023-04 - "Add AGGREGATED-BY-LIR status for IPv4 PA assignments"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE Code of Conduct and discussion on this list
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]