This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] off-topic postings in the AP WG mailing list
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2023-04 Who do I speak for?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] off-topic postings in the AP WG mailing list
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Tue Oct 17 11:50:02 CEST 2023
> On 17 Oct 2023, at 10:18, Kai 'wusel' Siering via address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > > All the prior talk about the RIPE DB doesn't belong here, either. If changes to the (operation or design of the) RIPE DB require changes to Address Policies, let's discuss about it here. Indeed. > Anything else, AFAICS, belongs into its own wg and accompanied mailing list. IMO a WG for this isn't necessary or desirable. A mailing list — say time-wasters at ripe.net — for meta-discussions about turning RIPE into a monument to process might be a good idea. Perhaps that could stop these discussions from cluttering the WG lists. And maybe avoid RIPE sleep-walking into unwelcome clone of process-heavy organisations. Replies and followups to /dev/null since there isn’t (yet) an appropriate list to further discuss this.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2023-04 Who do I speak for?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] off-topic postings in the AP WG mailing list
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]