This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2023-02 Last Call for Comments (Minimum Size for IPv4 Temporary Assignments)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2023-02 Last Call for Comments (Minimum Size for IPv4 Temporary Assignments)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2023-02 Last Call for Comments (Minimum Size for IPv4 Temporary Assignments)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Cynthia Revström
me at cynthia.re
Wed Jul 12 14:10:27 CEST 2023
I have minor editorial nitpicks but I still support this proposal in the current form. -Cynthia On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 10:26 AM Erik Bais <erik at bais.name> wrote: > > Dear AP-WG members, > > > > Please be aware that the Last Call for Comments of the min. size for IPv4 temp assignments is about to end .. ( June 13 2023 – aka tomorrow ) > > > > As chairs we would like to receive a bit more comments / support during last call, as it has been silent .. > > > > To reach consensus, we are not only looking for objections .. but also for support of the community and this is a request to speak up. > > So even if you voiced support in previous phases, let us know again in the Last Call phase as well. > > > > Have a nice day, > > Erik Bais > > On behalf of the AP-WG Chairs, co-Chair > > > > From: address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net> on behalf of Karen Hung <khung at ripe.net> > Date: Wednesday, 14 June 2023 at 10:07 > To: "address-policy-wg at ripe.net" <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> > Subject: [address-policy-wg] 2023-02 Last Call for Comments (Minimum Size for IPv4 Temporary Assignments) > > > > Dear colleagues, > > Proposal 2023-02, "Minimum Size for IPv4 Temporary Assignments" is now in Concluding Phase. > > This policy proposal recommends setting the minimum assignment size to a /24 while still allowing for a smaller assignment if requested by the End User. This policy proposal also allows routing requirements to justify the request for more than a /24 for research purposes. > > The WG co-chairs have declared that rough consensus has been reached and the proposal will now move to Last Call. > > As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this four week Concluding Phase is to give an opportunity to present well-justified objections for those who missed the previous two phases and wish to oppose the proposal. > Any objection must be made by 13 July 2023 and must be supported by an explanation. > If no substantive objections are raised by the end of Last Call, the proposal will complete the PDP and will be evaluated by the WG co-chairs for final consensus. > > You can find the full proposal at: > https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2023-02 > > Please e-mail any final comments about this proposal to <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> before 13 July 2023. > > > Kind regards, > Karen Hung > On behalf of Policy Officer > RIPE NCC > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2023-02 Last Call for Comments (Minimum Size for IPv4 Temporary Assignments)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2023-02 Last Call for Comments (Minimum Size for IPv4 Temporary Assignments)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]