This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2023-01 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IXP IPv4 assignment default size to a /26)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2023-01 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IXP IPv4 assignment default size to a /26)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2023-01 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IXP IPv4 assignment default size to a /26)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at foobar.org
Wed Feb 8 21:47:48 CET 2023
Matthias Wichtlhuber wrote on 08/02/2023 13:36: > This part of the proposal is intended to foster the adoption of the technology. > IXPs may offer it as beta or experimental while still doing the actual exchange > of traffic via standard BGP over IPv4. Hi Matthias, this is premature: if the protocol didn't work well in production environments, that would raise questions about the wisdom of mandating the protocol in the first place. In any event, as Randy pointed out, it's generally not a good idea to use policy in one area to try to force specific technology choices in another. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2023-01 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IXP IPv4 assignment default size to a /26)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2023-01 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IXP IPv4 assignment default size to a /26)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]