This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2023-04 Review Phase (Add AGGREGATED-BY-LIR status for IPv4 PA assignments)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2023-04 Review Phase (Add AGGREGATED-BY-LIR status for IPv4 PA assignments)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2023-04 Review Phase (Add AGGREGATED-BY-LIR status for IPv4 PA assignments)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sylvain Baya
abscoco at gmail.com
Mon Dec 18 22:11:31 CET 2023
Dear address-policy WG, Hope this email finds you in good health! Please see my comments below, inline... Thanks. Le vendredi 15 décembre 2023, Peter Hessler <phessler at theapt.org> a écrit : > I still support the proposal as-is. The proposed change does not > weaken any data that is in the database, and in fact may allow it to be > more obvious that these address ranges are used by end users rather than > be unclear what their status is. > > Hi Peter, Thanks for your email, brother. > > Furthermore, I will state that Denis' objections are not relevant to the > proposal. > ...this statement might have not sufficiently considered the fundamental issues raised by him. > The proposers, various people on the lists (including myself), > and the RIPE NCC themselves all state the opposite of what Denis is > saying. > ...i have to step in; because i think it should not be about the number of occurrence of an argument. ...imho! consensus should not be attained when fundamental issues such as a misinterpretation of a policy, or its misimplementation, might have occured silently. What's the process in the event of such a claim ? ...imho, i'm not sure that we should just move on without first correcting the mistinterpretation issue identified :-/ Without restoring the truth, it would be really tough to correctly evaluate the risks regarding proposed changes around the actual policy. > In addition the proposers have, in my opinion, addressed the > concerns stated. > ...as the core problem is above them; they stated that they refer to the Staff who produced the IA (Impact Analysis); avoiding the hot topic :-/ The issue raised by Denis remains unaddressed... ...imho! ...i stand with him; asking for a pause regarding the progress of this policy proposal. Shalom, --sb. > -peter > > > On 2023 Nov 21 (Tue) at 11:13:57 +0100 (+0100), Angela Dall'Ara wrote: > [...] -- Best Regards ! __ baya.sylvain[AT cmNOG DOT cm]|<https://cmnog.cm/dokuwiki/Structure> Subscribe to Mailing List: <https://lists.cmnog.cm/mailman/listinfo/cmnog/> __ #LASAINTEBIBLE|#Romains15:33«Que LE #DIEU de #Paix soit avec vous tous! #Amen!» #MaPrière est que tu naisses de nouveau. #Chrétiennement «Comme une biche soupire après des courants d’eau, ainsi mon âme soupire après TOI, ô DIEU!»(#Psaumes42:2) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20231218/0c75361d/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2023-04 Review Phase (Add AGGREGATED-BY-LIR status for IPv4 PA assignments)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2023-04 Review Phase (Add AGGREGATED-BY-LIR status for IPv4 PA assignments)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]