This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] IXP pool lower boundary of assignments
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IXP pool lower boundary of assignments
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IXP pool lower boundary of assignments
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tore Anderson
tore at fud.no
Mon Oct 31 13:18:51 CET 2022
* Matthias Wichtlhuber > As per my analysis, there has been a ~40% increase in IXPs world-wide > over the last three years (see my initial mail). Given that number, I > don't think we should wait and continue wasting space with too large > assignments until 2027. I agree, but as I also said back when 2019-05 was being discussed… > IMHO, the default assignment should be something like /25. …I believe the default (and minimum) should be /29. Lavishing /25s on IXPs with just a handful of members is really not that much better than the /24s we currently give them. If the ISP needs something larger than the default, there is no problem. All it has to do is to ask for a larger assignment, just like today. Tore
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IXP pool lower boundary of assignments
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IXP pool lower boundary of assignments
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]