[address-policy-wg] IXP pool lower boundary of assignments

If you want to change that you are invited to propose your own policy change. 
Past has shown that changing one single thing in a policy is way easier than to change a couple of things at once.

> On 3. Nov 2022, at 22:11, David Farmer via address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> wrote:
> 
> Finally, maybe there should be a maximum allocation size of /24. An IXP that is successful enough to need more than a /24 probably can afford to go to the marketplace for the additional IPv4 address space it needs. This reserved pool should be there to facilitate new IXPs and get them to a critical mass of suitability. Not to facilitate the growth of the largest IXPs. 

-- 
Wolfgang Tremmel                     

Phone +49 69 1730902 0  | wolfgang.tremmel at de-cix.net
Executive Directors: Ivaylo Ivanov and Sebastian Seifert | Trade Registry: AG Cologne, HRB 51135
DE-CIX Management GmbH | Lindleystrasse 12 | 60314 Frankfurt am Main | Germany | www.de-cix.net