This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] IXP pool lower boundary of assignments
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2022-02 New Policy Proposal (Remove mandatory IPv4 PA assignment registration in the RIPE Database)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IXP pool lower boundary of assignments
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Matthias Wichtlhuber
matthias.wichtlhuber at de-cix.net
Tue Nov 1 11:43:31 CET 2022
While I think a /29 would be too radical (renumbering peering LANs can be a real headache, you don't want to do that more often than needed), a /26 as a default might be a good compromise. 62 usable addresses are still enough for ~70% of all IXes including 100% over provisioning. This would likely stretch the pool well into the 2030s. Other than that, I think the current policy is fine and I wouldn't want to touch any other parts of it. -- Dr.-Ing. Matthias Wichtlhuber Senior Researcher ------------------------------ DE-CIX Management GmbH Lindleystr. 12, 60314 Frankfurt (Germany) phone: +49 69 1730902 141 mobile: +49 171 3836036 fax: +49 69 4056 2716 e-mail: matthias.wichtlhuber at de-cix.net web: www.de-cix.net ------------------------------ DE-CIX Management GmbH Executive Directors: Ivaylo Ivanov and Sebastian Seifert Trade registry: District court (Amtsgericht) Cologne, HRB 51135 Registered office: Lichtstr. 43i, 50825 Cologne ------------------------------ DE-CIX 25th anniversary: Without you the Internet would not be the same! Join us on the journey at https://withoutyou.de-cix.net ________________________________________ Von: Tore Anderson <tore at fud.no> Gesendet: Montag, 31. Oktober 2022 13:18:51 An: Matthias Wichtlhuber; Kurt Kayser; address-policy-wg at ripe.net Cc: Sander Steffann; Arnold Nipper; Gert Doering Betreff: Re: [address-policy-wg] IXP pool lower boundary of assignments * Matthias Wichtlhuber > As per my analysis, there has been a ~40% increase in IXPs world-wide > over the last three years (see my initial mail). Given that number, I > don't think we should wait and continue wasting space with too large > assignments until 2027. I agree, but as I also said back when 2019-05 was being discussed… > IMHO, the default assignment should be something like /25. …I believe the default (and minimum) should be /29. Lavishing /25s on IXPs with just a handful of members is really not that much better than the /24s we currently give them. If the ISP needs something larger than the default, there is no problem. All it has to do is to ask for a larger assignment, just like today. Tore
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2022-02 New Policy Proposal (Remove mandatory IPv4 PA assignment registration in the RIPE Database)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IXP pool lower boundary of assignments
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]