[address-policy-wg] Policy building - call for volunteers

Hi Martin,

On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 11:50 AM Martin Stanislav <ms at uakom.sk> wrote:
>
> Hi James,
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 08:59:44AM +0200, James Kennedy wrote:
> >
> > 2.1. The task force recommends that as resource holders have full
> > responsibility over the registration of their IPv4 PA assignment(s),
> > they are free to make assignments or not. If the community accepts
> > this recommendation, the relevant RIPE Policies should be updated
> > accordingly, and documenting IPv4 PA assignment(s) will stop being a
> > policy requirement.
>
> Is this line of thought that a responsibility over the registration
> of an aggregate IP resource implies optional documenting of a resouce
> subset explained somewhere? Was utilization of an aggregate resource
> the only reason to document details?

Explanation and analysis from the TF on that recommendation can be
found in the archives of APWG RIPE meeting sessions:
- RIPE83, agenda item F: https://ripe83.ripe.net/programme/meeting-plan/ap-wg/
- RIPE83, agenda item G: https://ripe82.ripe.net/programme/meeting-plan/ap-wg/

In the interest of being productive and moving forward with the
recommendations to the next phase, we would now like to focus on
getting interested volunteers to work on developing policy proposals
via the PDP (Policy Development Process). There will be ample
opportunity for the community to revisit and discuss any detail once
again during the PDP:
https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies
https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-710

Regards,
James
APWG co-chair