This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] EU sanctions against Russia
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] EU sanctions against Russia
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] EU sanctions against Russia
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Den
den.rlir at gmail.com
Thu Mar 17 21:08:12 CET 2022
In such a critical time, we see that the RIPE board decided to work with them, to support them... no comments. -- Regards, Den 16.03.2022 22:37, Matthias Merkel wrote: > The sanctions don't prohibit all trade with Russia and most of the companies choosing not to continue it are doing so because they think it will help. I'm sure the RIPE NCC will not be willingly violating law here. > > Matthias Merkel > > -----Original Message----- > From: address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net> On Behalf Of Den > Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2022 9:30 PM > To: Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com> > Cc: address-policy-wg at ripe.net > Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] EU sanctions against Russia > > I'm not a law-specialist, but while so many companies exits from Russia you are still doing your business there and supporting them, i.e. from Hans words "We have also informed Russian members that they do not risk closure if sanctions-related factors mean they are unable to make payment.". > > -- > Regards, > Den > > 16.03.2022 14:13, Jim Reid wrote: >>> Why RIPE NCC ignores EU sanctions against Russia? >> Which specific EU sanctions do you think the NCC is ignoring? >>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] EU sanctions against Russia
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] EU sanctions against Russia
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]