[address-policy-wg] Review of IPv6 policy goals

Of course, nobody can force others to work with anyone, however this means:

1) We can't call this community anymore open, transparent and inclusive.
2) Several people not willing to work with others will create a number of groups of people working on the same or very similar things, and they we will have funny discussions when we have competing policy proposals.

I don't think this is right neither good at all. Of course, in that case, the chairs will need to avoid discrimination and accept all the possible different proposals from different people, which is smarter than having a single one.

And by the way, if you don't want to work with other community member(s), you should openly tell that.

Also, the chairs should have made explicit that the call for volunteers was done to create different groups of people not willing to work with others, as clearly the chairs knew that some "small" group was working already on that, and they didn't even provide the opportunity to the other volunteers to participate.

Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
 
 

El 16/3/22, 13:04, "Gert Doering" <gert at space.net> escribió:

    Hi,

    On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 12:25:27PM +0100, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg wrote:
    > We have already seen several samples of discrimination in the RIPE community since some months ago. Is this one more? Should we change the principles of openness and inclusivity?

    You can not force random volunteer people (with no formal power or mandate)
    to work with you.

    This has nothing to do with "inclusivity" but with "it's my choice who
    I spend my time with".  

    It's also only discrimination if there is a process for joining and you 
    are rejected because you are "Jordi", instead of generic reasoning, like
    "we have enough people already".  (OTOH, with all these accusations being
    thrown around by you, I'm sure all volunteer groups will all be totally 
    happy to have you on board, and will be making exceptions to their rules,
     just for you.  Which would not be discriminating, of course.)


    Now, for everything relevant to policy decisions, this happens on the
    public list.  If you haven't seen anything, this is because nothing has
    happened yet.

    Gert Doering
            -- volunteer
    -- 
    have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

    SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
    Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
    D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
    Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.