This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] ripe-587, Temporary Internet Number Assignment Policies
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] ripe-587, Temporary Internet Number Assignment Policies
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] ripe-587, Temporary Internet Number Assignment Policies
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Jan 26 18:32:22 CET 2022
Hi, On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 09:33:40AM -0800, Randy Bush wrote: > ok, i did it again, tried to fit a square peg in a round hole. while > the immediate problem is past, thanks to the ncc reg folk, i fear that > we could benefit from thinking a bit more about $subject. > > for a research experiment, we wanted eight or a dozen routable, i.e. > /24, prefixes which we would announce from various places in the > topology. each /24 would have one pingable address, let's assume .42. This is a tough nut. I can totally see what you do, and understand what space you need, and for which times. OTOH, I can totally see the NCC being worried about people claiming "experiments! and I need a review!" and running their ISP for a year on temporary space - and with the argument "I want a dozen routable /24s", you can get quite some ISP work done. [..] > i am considering a policy proposal in this space; but want to learn what > others see and think, and to see if it is worth the time and effort. I want research and conferences and all these things to be possible, with temporary address space, and policies to be fairly liberal for "those good things". The NCC needs checklist-able items to say "this is okay" and "that is way too much space, you do not need a /16 for 6 months to run a conference with 1000 attendees for a week. How to codify this? Dunno. Marco, Angela - what's your take on this ("feedback from RS" time)? Gert Doering -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20220126/0e306b31/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] ripe-587, Temporary Internet Number Assignment Policies
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] ripe-587, Temporary Internet Number Assignment Policies
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]