This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Maximum size for current IPv4 allocations
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Maximum size for current IPv4 allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Maximum size for current IPv4 allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bogdan Rotariu
bogdan at rotariu.ro
Mon Aug 15 10:41:30 CEST 2022
> On Aug 15, 2022, at 11:19, Ronald F. Guilmette <rfg at tristatelogic.com> wrote: > In message <301e0ef8-ed15-67d3-d390-7bea8571c7cb at ripe.net>, > Marco Schmidt <mschmidt at ripe.net> wrote: > >> On 15/08/2022 09:16, Gert Doering wrote: >>> Hi, >>> On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 12:10:49AM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >>>> What is the maximum size for current new IPv4 allocations in the RIPE >>>> region? >>> /24 "if there is something to distribute at all" >> >> Just to confirm what Gert said. >> >> For more information please feel free to check our website about IPv4 >> https://www.ripe.net/manage-ips-and-asns/ipv4 >> >> as well the underlying RIPE policy which was published in November 2019 >> https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-733#51 > > Thank you for the confirmation. Unfortunately, I remain rather mystified > by how the following IPv4 blocks, and the current RIPE WHOIS records that > pertain to them, comport with what you and Gert have just now told me. > Perhaps there is something that I am missing (?) > > ORG-AS976-RIPE: > > 31.44.32.0/20 created: 2022-06-24T06:46:34Z > 46.21.16.0/21 created: 2022-06-24T06:46:34Z > 46.21.28.0/22 created: 2022-06-24T06:46:34Z > 77.220.64.0/19 created: 2022-06-23T09:56:04Z > 185.155.176.0/22 created: 2022-06-23T09:56:04Z > 185.155.184.0/22 created: 2022-06-24T06:46:34Z > 193.221.216.0/23 created: 2022-06-24T06:46:33Z > 193.222.104.0/23 created: 2022-06-24T06:46:33Z > > > Regards, > rfg > > > P.S. I would still be concerned, although perhaps a bit less concerned, if > this organisation had not elected to place a fradulent and non-existant > comnpany name into its public WHOIS organisation: record. I would however > still remain befuddled by how this organisation managed to be assigned > some 72 times as much IPv4 address space as anybody else could get, all > apparently less than 2 months ago. > > But there must be a reasoable explanation, I suppose. There is, those are transfers, check them here https://www.ripe.net/manage-ips-and-asns/resource-transfers-and-mergers/transfer-statistics/within-ripe-ncc-service-region/ipv4-transfer-statistics -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20220815/8e9e7d84/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Maximum size for current IPv4 allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Maximum size for current IPv4 allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]