This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] IPv4 waiting list policy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 waiting list policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 waiting list policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Martin Stanislav
ms at uakom.sk
Wed Dec 8 16:14:49 CET 2021
On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 02:40:24PM +0000, Jim Reid wrote: > > > > On 8 Dec 2021, at 14:12, Rick Bakker <rick at bakker-it.eu> wrote: > > > > (e.g. just look at "Network Space Provider <no.> LTD" in the British company register). All are/were held by a single UBO. > > BTW if these firms had a single ultimate beneficial owner, it would have been trivial to obscure that fact. Just register each company with different but bogus identities. CH does not check this information. Which by implication would make it hard for the NCC to check. NCC is already spending resouces on "Know Your Customer" (KYC) efforts wrt due diligence for the quality of registration data and the sanctions. I'm by no means trying to say this is an easy or exhilarating endeavour, or that it's possible to reuse such efforts early enough to save any v4 resources for the new entrants. Martin
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 waiting list policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 waiting list policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]