This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] IPv4 waiting list policy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 waiting list policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 waiting list policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Ingvoldstad
frettled at gmail.com
Wed Dec 8 14:47:19 CET 2021
On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 12:26 PM Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote: > > C) IPv4 waiting list priority follows the size of existing allocations > for > > the LIR. The lower amount of allocations, starting with zero, the higher > > the priority. > > if the purpose of new allocations is to allow entry, why would an LIR > with any existing allocation be given more? > That would only happen if there are zero new entrants, as an LIR with any existing allocation would have a lower priority on the waiting list. -- Jan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20211208/f36641c2/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 waiting list policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 waiting list policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]