[address-policy-wg] IPv4 waiting list policy

>>Actually, the point is to have something to offer to the newcomers.

We can update the transfer policy and transfer hold time to 60months or
even more to make it less attractive,
Also make a change to the policy to make no /24 allocation to multi LIR
accounts.

Regards,

Arash


On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 6:41 PM Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 06:03:53PM +1100, Arash Naderpour wrote:
> > >My suggestion would be along the lines what was proposed on the APWG
> > >meeting already - earmark these /24s as non-transferrable, ever.
> >
> > I don't think it is a good idea to split the IPv4 addresses into
> different
> > types, transferable and non-transferrable. it puts those newcomers in a
> > disadvantageous position compared to the older members, it is not fair
> and
> > doesn't fix anything in long term.
>
> Actually, the point is to have something to offer to the newcomers.
>
> If we do not stop the hoarding *now*, there won't be any IPv4 left - would
> that be "more fair" to the newcomers?
>
>
> I wouldn't mind a policy that says "The RIPE NCC does no longer deal in
> IPv4 resources at all.  Everything coming back into the RIPE NCC free
> pool is returned to IANA." - that would be maximally *fair* (the same
> amount of nothing for everybody), but I assume you wouldn't like that
> either.
>
> Gert Doering
>         -- NetMaster
> --
> have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
>
> SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael
> Emmer
> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
> D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
> Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20211208/26aec936/attachment.html>