This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] stockpiling IPv6
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] stockpiling IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] stockpiling IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Wed Oct 28 14:43:29 CET 2020
> On 28 Oct 2020, at 12:51, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > > Exactly, that’s the point, there is no incentive – the only incentive is stockpiling, just in case IPv6 becomes scarse and may create a problem like the lack of IPv4, even if this takes 30 years, or 100 years, and you want to secure the funding of the kids of your kids by having a resource that then, will be subjected to market price and transfers. This is beyond ridiculous. Why isn’t *anyone* worrying about the Y10K problem? I demand action! :-) PS The “won't someone think of the children?” emotional rhetoric is a very strong indication someone doesn’t have an evidence-based argument.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] stockpiling IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] stockpiling IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]