[address-policy-wg] stockpiling IPv6

Hi Nick,

Could you explain why not?

Clearly it is something that should part of the NCC verification duties, but we have been told several times, in other policy proposals, that we need to make it explicit so they can "act".

Otherwise, do you have other suggestions, or do you think the we should ignore the stockpiling?

Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
 
 

El 28/10/20 13:09, "address-policy-wg en nombre de Nick Hilliard" <address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net en nombre de nick at foobar.org> escribió:

    JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg wrote on 28/10/2020 12:05:
    > However, in RIPE NCC, if you created several LIRs for getting more
    > IPv4 allocations, *even if you don't use/need it* you can get (and
    > thus stockpile) IPv6 *at no extra cost*.
    [...]
    > Do we need some text about "recovery if not announced and used" ?

    tl;dr: no.

    Nick




**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.