[address-policy-wg] FW: ASNs of organizations in reported IPv4 transfers

> Because it's not rational or meaningful to do that. There's no reason
> to assume that there's a static, unchanging binding between address
> space and an ASN.

if there was, we would not need routing :)

further, there is no actual _routing_ binding of an AS to a member LIR
identity.  i.e. an LIR may have no ASs, or multiple ASs.  address space
'belonging' to an LIR might be legitimately announced by an AS belonging
to a different LIR.

from a research point of view, one might ask whether these confounding
complications are sufficiently prevalent to obscure the signal which
vasileios seeks.

[ persoanlly, i would not go down this capybara hole ]

randy