[address-policy-wg] My response to Ronald Guilmette

Toma,

And not to procmail your friend from "The Spamhaus Project" - Ronald Guilmette ?

All the subscribers should see how members of the illegal anonymous organization "The Spamhaus Project" - such as Toma - is trying to shut down the discussion  in an unbalanced way.

"The Spamhaus Project" share massive amount of illegal obtained privacy data of internet users that they receive on a regular basis from their secret contacts - like Toma - in many internet organizations and in many internet companies - according to their own presentation that they wrote on themselves:

https://www.scribd.com/document/445894312/Spamhaus-Illegal-Private-Data-Violation

"The Spamhaus Project" have secret members in CO-chairs of the Ripe working groups, exactly like Richard D G Cox was (that wrote the above linked presentation), so if any unbalanced action will taken towards me from a CO-chair of a Ripe working group - I will not be surprised.

Respectfully,
Elad
________________________________
From: Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera at gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2020 1:36 PM
To: Gert Doering <gert at space.net>
Cc: Elad Cohen <elad at netstyle.io>; address-policy-wg at ripe.net <address-policy-wg at ripe.net>
Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] My response to Ronald Guilmette

Peace,

On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 1:33 PM Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote:
> As I said, it was not necessary to have a third WG chair repeat the same
> thing that Briand and Denis already said.

Gert, could we just procmail this folk so not to waste a few thousands
of subscribers' time?  I'd be grateful, for one, if we could.

--
Töma
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20200418/d599e243/attachment.html>