This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2019-07 New Policy Proposal (Default assignment size for IXPs)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-07 New Policy Proposal (Default assignment size for IXPs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-07 Discussion Period extended until 19 December (Default assignment size for IXPs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kai 'wusel' Siering
wusel+ml at uu.org
Fri Nov 15 14:28:25 CET 2019
Moin, am 15.11.19 um 13:22 schrieb Nick Hilliard: > It's not clear what changing the assignment policy is going to fix. As far as I can see, it would give a use case for the fragmented space RIPE NCC holds, while saving on the final IXP-v4 addresses at the same time? Regards, -kai
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-07 New Policy Proposal (Default assignment size for IXPs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-07 Discussion Period extended until 19 December (Default assignment size for IXPs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]