This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] cultural idioms in RIPE discussions
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] cultural idioms in RIPE discussions
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] cultural idioms in RIPE discussions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Scott Leibrand
scottleibrand at gmail.com
Fri Nov 1 16:19:12 CET 2019
His email contained a suggestion to move an entire thread, that is threatening to become all noise and no signal, to a more appropriate discussion venue, namely the diversity working group. His one-word reply (not counting quoting, which modern mail clients do a good job of hiring) may have been the highest signal to noise ratio of this entire OT (albeit legitimate meta-discussion) thread. Scott > On Nov 1, 2019, at 5:57 AM, Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com> wrote: > > > >> On 1 Nov 2019, at 12:53, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> wrote: >> >> Diversity? > > Your email contained 1 word of signal and ~1000 words of noise. > > Please try to be more considerate when you post. > > >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] cultural idioms in RIPE discussions
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] cultural idioms in RIPE discussions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]