[address-policy-wg] 2019-05 New Policy Proposal (Revised IPv4 assignment policy for IXPs)

> On 31. May 2019, at 09:41, Tore Anderson <tore at fud.no> wrote:
> 
> Considering how extremely uncommon this configuration is, I'd prefer it to be the other way around, i.e., that a small IXP with a dozen members would need to explain why they need a /24 in order to get it, otherwise they'd get a /27 by default.

when an IXP first applies for an allocation out of the pool it has zero customers. It only has a business plan and how many customers it *expects* to have.
Which easily can be "tweaked". So to avoid that RIPE NCC checks business plans we should stick with /24 as default.

best regards,
Wolfgang

-- 
Wolfgang Tremmel                     

Phone +49 69 1730902 0 | Fax +49 69 4056 2716 | | wolfgang.tremmel at de-cix.net
Executive Directors: Harald A. Summa and Sebastian Seifert | Trade Registry: AG Cologne, HRB 51135
DE-CIX Management GmbH | Lindleystrasse 12 | 60314 Frankfurt am Main | Germany | www.de-cix.net


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4191 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20190531/74f003ab/attachment.p7s>