This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2019-05 New Policy Proposal (Revised IPv4 assignment policy for IXPs)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-05 New Policy Proposal (Revised IPv4 assignment policy for IXPs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-05 New Policy Proposal (Revised IPv4 assignment policy for IXPs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Denis Fondras
ripe at liopen.fr
Wed May 29 16:33:38 CEST 2019
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 04:13:15PM +0200, Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN wrote: > The alternative is that in just a few years it will no longer provide IXPs > with any space. > Well, I agree that standing against this proposal on such a small point is a bit strong (I am totally in favor of reserving a /15 to IXPs) but I think setting in stone a limitation without a rationale does not make sense. I won't argue more, I guess you see my point :) Denis
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-05 New Policy Proposal (Revised IPv4 assignment policy for IXPs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-05 New Policy Proposal (Revised IPv4 assignment policy for IXPs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]