[address-policy-wg] 2019-02 Review Phase (IPv4 Waiting List Implementation)

Hi Kai,

> I don't see this either, hence, while I agree that there should be some wording about the way the (already implicit) waiting list will be implemented/handled, I reject the proposal as-is due to the reduction of the assignment size.
> 
> Reducing the assignment for new LIRs from /22 to /24 neither helps the community, nor the late-coming LIR in question.

This presentation from RIPE NCC at RIPE77 shows that changing the allocation size does help significantly: https://ripe77.ripe.net/presentations/71-Andrea_Cima_RIPE_77_APWG.pdf slide 14.

> IPv4 is gone, we pray every other minute, so we should act accordingly.

Unfortunately the world is not as simple as that :'(

Cheers,
Sander

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20190529/ac532916/attachment.sig>