This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Agenda for APWG meeting in Reykjavik
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Agenda for APWG meeting in Reykjavik
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Agenda for APWG meeting in Reykjavik
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friaças
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Fri May 10 11:05:27 CEST 2019
Hi, Just a small note: 2019-03 is not about "anti-spam", it's about "hijacks". (if some people are not able to abide by the RIR/registry work, then why they need to be part of it?) As far as we authors have been told, the doubt was really between the anti-abuse WG and the routing WG. In fact, as similar proposals are at the table already at LACNIC (see LAC-2019-05) and ARIN (more or less, see prop-266), this might be touched (i hope) during the PDO's presentation. :-) Best Regards, Carlos On Thu, 9 May 2019, Randy Bush wrote: > perhaps, as it is, imiho, more address policy than anti-spam, the > anti-abuse wg proposal 2019-03 > > https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-03 > > would be worth a bit of consideration as address policy? > > randy >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Agenda for APWG meeting in Reykjavik
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Agenda for APWG meeting in Reykjavik
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]