[address-policy-wg] PA ??? life after death

Hi,

On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 02:02:34PM +0100, Stary Bezpiek wrote:
> It's still lot of technical problems with IPv6 - the main one is dealing 
> IPv6 by software (processors) instead of hardware.
> The first-hand example: Mikrotik. Lot of HW offload functions are only 
> for IPv4. Same is with some Cisco's, or other randomly pointed devices. 
> Amen.

I don't think anything built by Cisco in the last 10 years falls into the
"IPv4 in hardware, IPv6 in software" category anymore.  Maybe even 15 years.

Instead of spreading outdated information, better spend the time working
with those vendors that still ship broken implementations, or take your
money elsewhere.

If you look for excuses why you are not deploying IPv6, there will be
plenty (see http://ipv6excuses.com).  If you *want* to deploy, all
the difficulties can be overcome - we've run IPv6 in production 
quality (= no performance penalty, fully monitored, etc.) since close 
to 20 years now.  And yes, lots of obstacles in the beginning.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20190308/6913e442/attachment.sig>