This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] PA ??? life after death
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PA ??? life after death
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PA ??? life after death
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Maxim A Piskunov
ffamax at gmail.com
Wed Mar 6 22:23:45 CET 2019
Hello, Gert! LIR allocate from their PA some network to end-user. Even LIR will be closed, why end-user should lose allocated resources? What did end-user do wrong? Why end-user should lost allocated resources? As you wrote: "usually: (1) non-payment, (2) lying to the NCC, or (3) getting convicted of criminal activity" 1. End-user may initiate payment via temporary (substitutional) for allocated resources - it's not a reason for resources recall. 2.1 LIR lying to the NCC - ok. Close LIR but pass used resources to another LIR, why not? Who invented recall and for what? For pain? 2.2 End-user lying to LIR (but check passed) and as result LIR lying to NCC - yes, we can recall end-user resources, but only lying end-users. Not all resources of LIR. 3. Criminal activity should not impact end-users who did not do anything criminal. Current policy do not protect end-users. LIR - it's just like an administrator. We can fire administrator but current policy respectively destroy building where administrator has worked. On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 23:22, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 10:42:17AM +0300, Maxim A Piskunov wrote: > > As I understand "NetUP Ltd." will loose their PA-addresses if LIR status > > will not recovered and customers will should renumbering their networks. > > I have one simple question: why not specified procedure of keeping > > originally allocated addresses for case when LIR-status under > cancellation > > and LIR can't transfer PA to another LIR. > > Or I miss something and chance to keep addresses is exists? > > If I can keep my addresses even if I do not fulfill my contractual > obligations to the NCC ("pay my bill, do not lie, etc.") - why should > I do that, then? > > Resources can only be kept while the LIR is not closed, and that will > not happen unless there is good reason (usually: non-payment, lying > to the NCC, or getting convicted of criminal activity). > > Gert Doering > -- APWG chair > -- > have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? > > SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael > Emmer > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann > D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) > Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20190307/8d9b9d0a/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PA ??? life after death
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PA ??? life after death
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]