This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] question about IPv4 legacy and transfers - should we convert legacy to non-legacy with transfers?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] question about IPv4 legacy and transfers - should we convert legacy to non-legacy with transfers?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] question about IPv4 legacy and transfers - should we convert legacy to non-legacy with transfers?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at foobar.org
Tue Jul 23 23:18:56 CEST 2019
Carlos Friaças wrote on 23/07/2019 22:03: > "e.g. geographic association" > > -- really...?????? Yep, really. https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/comp-pol-2018v2.pdf see Section 1.3.4 - Out of region Use. + also: https://afrinic.net/policy/manual > 5.4.6.2 AFRINIC resources are for AFRINIC service region and any use > outside the region should be solely in support of connectivity back > to the AFRINIC region. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] question about IPv4 legacy and transfers - should we convert legacy to non-legacy with transfers?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] question about IPv4 legacy and transfers - should we convert legacy to non-legacy with transfers?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]