[address-policy-wg] question about IPv4 legacy and transfers - should we convert legacy to non-legacy with transfers?

Hi,

On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 08:01:44PM +0200, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg wrote:
> We, as a community, should look for the benefit of the community.

You still fail to bring forward a clear reasoning this would be so.

If you argue "the buyer wants this!" it's not an argument why this
would be "beneficial for the community" - but more an argument for
why no change is needed.

> I've already said this, but let me to repeat it: This is my opinion, and it looks was the opinion of the other 4 RIR communities.

From what I've heard so far, this was not an explicit change but more
a "it happened somewhere along the historic evolution of things".  So,
"the opinion of the other 4 RIR communities" might be exaggerating a
slight bit

> You opinion can be diverse, of course, but it is clear that I'm not alone.

I fail to see much support for your well-formulated problem statement.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20190717/03c9453d/attachment.sig>