[address-policy-wg] question about IPv4 legacy and transfers - should we convert legacy to non-legacy with transfers?

Hi Jordi,

Maybe you can provide any documentation available from the other RIRs 
about their rationale why they implemented this kind of policy? Maybe 
they have some strong arguments we are missing here?


Gert Doering wrote at 2019-07-16 10:46:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:29:28AM +0200, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via
> address-policy-wg wrote:
>> Again, please consider, if it is good that we are the only RIR not 
>> doing so. I don't think that's good.
> 
> If this is the main argument ("I changed this in all the other RIRs,
> and now *you* are the only ones stubbornly refusing to follow my
> all-the-others-are-doing-this argument") - it's a somewhat weak one.
> 
> You have failed to bring forward any reason for changing things, except
> 
>  "it is unfair that there is a difference"
> 
> (without detailing what exactly the unfairness would be, who would
> be disadvantaged by this, exactly, and why they would be affected
> positively by this proposal) - and
> 
>  "all the other RIRs have changed this!"
> 
> which is both not very compelling.
> 
> 
> I could also not see anyone speak up in a supportive way, so I'd 
> consider
> this "sufficiently discussed, and no support to go for a formal 
> proposal".
> 
> Gert Doering
>         -- APWG chair