[address-policy-wg] question about IPv4 legacy and transfers - should we convert legacy to non-legacy with transfers?

Hi,

On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 02:04:11PM +0200, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg wrote:
> My personal view but looking for the good of the community is that it is better to get rid ASAP of the "legacy" status for as much resources we can, so they are fully part of the policy system.

We have no contractual leverance to do anything to "legacy" addresses.

These are addresses that were assigned outside the RIR system, so there
exists no contracts with any RIR, and no way we can use our policies to 
make the holders do something "we want them to do".

We can entice them to bring their space into the umbrella of RIPE DB
documentation (by offering ROAs, for example) - and this is what we do
today.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20190713/efeb312e/attachment.sig>