[address-policy-wg] suggestions from the list about IPv6 sub-assignment clarification

And I agree with all what you said!

I just want to make sure that we all are in the same page.

Regards,
Jordi
 
 

-----Mensaje original-----
De: address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net> en nombre de Kai 'wusel' Siering <wusel+ml at uu.org>
Fecha: jueves, 17 de enero de 2019, 15:10
Para: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg at ripe.net>
Asunto: Re: [address-policy-wg] suggestions from the list about IPv6 sub-assignment clarification

    
    
    Am 17. Januar 2019 14:21:38 MEZ schrieb JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg at ripe.net>:
    
    >I think this must be allowed, even if static/persistent, because I may need a service company coming to my network with their own devices, for example, installing IP video-cameras for surveillance. It doesn't make sense that they can't use my addresses, because that increase the complexity of the infrastructure, etc., even may force to have different networks.
    
    Nicely constructed, but ... usually you will not have them come to your site, let them install their gear out of blue sky, and just leave. You'll have some kind of contractual relationship in place to have them do something for you, making the devices part of your network for the time being, so assigning them PIv6 addresses is ok (they are part of End User's infrastructure at that time — if you are the receiving End User of the PIv6 in question).
    
    Regards,
    -kai
    
    



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.