This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI justification requirements
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI justification requirements
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI justification requirements
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Feb 27 11:37:45 CET 2019
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 11:08:11AM +0100, Cynthia Revström wrote:
> As I attempted to explain this was 3 separate uses that required
> separate announcements.
I'm not talking your particular case - just the generic statement
"the policies are too strict". This is just not true if stated that
broadly.
As for the particular case, I think some comments from Marco are
forthcoming.
Gert Doering
-- APWG chair
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20190227/20383df5/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI justification requirements
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI justification requirements
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]