[address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI justification requirements

I just want to clarify, that the NCC wanted documentation in the form of 
an addressing plan (over time?) and why PA space would not work.

Now I do also want to clarify that I have already told them that the 
reason for this is that they have multiple physical locations with 
servers and they want PI for their infrastructure so it is their 
resources and not the provider's.

I have also been informed that this might be a rather unique case in 
regards to having multiple physical locations requiring PI space.

- Cynthia

On 2019-02-26 23:00, Cynthia Revström wrote:
> Hello ap-wg,
>
> I am in the process of requesting 3x /48 of IPv6 PI for a customer, 
> and what confuses me is that the NCC requires way more justification 
> for 3x /48 of PI than for 2x /29 of PA.
>
> I do think that saying something like net1 will be used in the 
> Netherlands, net2 in London, and net3 in New York should be enough. I 
> mean after all, any LIR can get 512K /48s and unlike ASNs, PI space 
> does have a small fee attached with it.
>
> I can't think of a good reason why this is the case.
>
> Once again to make it clear, if you are a member it is easier to get 1 
> million /48s than it is for a non member to get 3 /48s.
>
> - Cynthia
>
>