This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Suchy
danny at danysek.cz
Thu Feb 7 18:34:54 CET 2019
Hello, On 2/7/19 1:17 PM, Servereasy via address-policy-wg wrote: > I oppose this proposal, unless at least RIPE NCC will charge members > based on how much IPv4 space they have. I find that this will be the > only way to really boost IPv6 adoption. this is problem maily due to law and related taxes. Such diversification was here and this changed few years back. I think only one reason, which will really boost IPv6 adoption is real exhaustion of IPv4 pool within our (RIPE) region. 2019-02 proposal is just delay this (and allowing more newcomers to start their bussiness), nothing else. - Daniel
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]