This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] can deadbeat LIRs reverse IPv4 exhaustion?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] can deadbeat LIRs reverse IPv4 exhaustion?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Thu Feb 7 11:14:18 CET 2019
> On 7 Feb 2019, at 07:59, Carlos Friaças via address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > > Even when the pools reach ZERO, if 1000 LIRs stop paying fees (and that's only one example/route), the "runout" will be temporarily reverted, and handing out IPv4 addresses will be again, in theory, possible. How is that possible? Once the pools reach zero, there are no more addresses to hand out. An RIR can't conjure up IPv4 address space out of thin air. If it was able to do that, we could just continue forever with business as usual and allocate v4 until the heat death of the universe. Besides, there’s no mechanism or policy for the NCC to recover addresses from LIRs that don’t pay their bills. If such mechanisms or policies existed, they’d be unworkable. There’s no way of knowing for sure that those addresses weren’t being used. So if they were reclaimed, the addresses couldn’t be allocated to someone else.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] can deadbeat LIRs reverse IPv4 exhaustion?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]