[address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)

On Wed, 6 Feb 2019, Kai 'wusel' Siering wrote:

(...)
> I'd rather hand that /21 as two /22 to two new LIRs instead of eight /24 
> to eight new LIRs, since a /24 is basically useless anyway.

I really don't agree with the former.
The spirit of 2019-02 is precisely that a /24 is the minimum usable 
allocation, mostly due to global routability.

An ORG/LIR might get a second /24 if needed (through a new LIR account), 
but it needs to go back into the queue... (if there is any at some point).


(...)
> IIRC, billing discussions are out of scope for the APWG. Besides, billing is not per resource currently, is it?

Here we are 200% in agreement :-)


Cheers,
Carlos


> Regards,
> -kai
> 
> 
>