[address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)

On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 11:23:53AM +0100, Martin Huněk wrote:
> Here it starts. I would say get such a LIR what you have got (to /22 of 
> course). Even by means of multiple /24s. But not blocks smaller than /24, as 
> it would be useless. Maybe let them decide if they would like to wait for 
> whole /22 where there would be less then 4x /24 (in that one case).
> 
[...]
> If you keep there /22 and /24 as an option, than there would be no problem.

No please, don't let LIR choose. This will only complicate management of
resources. In a FIFO, a LIR asking for /22 would delay a LIR who only
needs a /24.