[address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)

On Mon, 4 Feb 2019, Jetten Raymond wrote:

>
> Hi,

Hi Raymond,


> I strongly oppose this proposal, a similar proposal was mode before, (2017-03) ,
> and I agree with the arguments opposing the proposal.

It's really not the same proposal, although i'm the common link between 
2019-02 and 2017-03. Maybe the title could be more explicit about the 
moment when the proposed changes would kick in.

Which specific opposing arguments (to 2019-02) do you agree with?

Each one has a written counter-argument/mitigation.
Can you please point out which ones do you think are not valid?


Best Regards,
Carlos


> Rgds,
>
> Ray
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net> On Behalf Of Marco Schmidt
> Sent: 4. helmikuuta 2019 14:04
> To: address-policy-wg at ripe.net
> Subject: [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
>
> Dear colleagues,
>
> A new RIPE Policy proposal, 2019-02, "Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24"
> is now available for discussion.
>
> This proposal aims to reduce the IPv4 allocation size to a /24 once the
> RIPE NCC is unable to allocate contiguous /22 ranges.
>
> You can find the full proposal at:
> https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-02
>
> As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this
> four week Discussion Phase is to discuss the proposal and provide
> feedback to the proposer.
>
> At the end of the Discussion Phase, the proposer, with the agreement of
> the WG Chairs, will decide how to proceed with the proposal.
>
> We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to
> <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> before 5 March 2019.
>
> Regards,
>
> Marco Schmidt
> Policy Officer
>
>
>