This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friaças
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Tue Feb 5 11:21:27 CET 2019
On Tue, 5 Feb 2019, Uros Gaber wrote: > > This uncertainty will certainly also discourage LIRs from signing > up as member just to get IPv4 - regardless of the economics. Say, > if you need IPv4 to deliver a project due in six months, then > getting it from the market will be the only way that would give > you sufficient certainty that you can deliver on time. > > > Depending on the project, AFAIK temporary allocations are/will still be possible. Yes... people do lease ip address space... Carlos > Uros > >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]