[address-policy-wg] 2019-05 New Policy Proposal (Revised IPv4 assignment policy for IXPs)

On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 3:00 PM Tore Anderson <tore at fud.no> wrote:

> * Sascha Luck [ml]
>
> > On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 02:40:03PM +0200, Tore Anderson wrote:
> >> Repeating myself a bit[1], I'd say the default should be /29. This
> because the /29s are the smallest fragments left behind in the NCC
> inventory.
>
>
Well, I see that I could have participated at an earlier point in time and
muttered agreement for this. Sorry about that, because I do agree.

But as I understand it, there is not enough support for that?

However, in the proposal, we do have the following paragraph, in which /29
could be substituted for /27, as a sort of compromise?


   1. New IXPs will be assigned a /24 by default. Once they require a
   larger assignment, they must return their current one (or existing PI used
   as an IXP peering LAN) and receive a replacement up to maximum of a /22.
   After one year, utilisation of the new assignment must be at least 50%,
   unless special circumstances are defined. On request or once there are no
   more assignments of /24 (or larger) available, assignments can be made down
   to /27.


-- 
Jan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20190809/b79c65f1/attachment.html>