This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2018-01 Review Phase (Organisation-LIR Clarification in IPv6 Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2018-01 Review Phase (Organisation-LIR Clarification in IPv6 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2018-01 Review Phase (Organisation-LIR Clarification in IPv6 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alexey Galaev
alex at vpsville.ru
Fri May 25 15:00:42 CEST 2018
Dear colleges. I fully support the proposal because it has no negative consequences. It is very small and puts the current policy in the right order. If the new LIR can get the IPv4 network I don't see any reasons why new LIR can't get the IPv6 network. We must support the development of IPv6 but not create problems with IPv6. This proposal is like small fix on github. I don't see any reasons to not approve it. I think that "a LIR" or "an LIR" doesn't matter. BR, Alexey Galaev +7 985 3608004, http://vpsville.ru http://cloudville.ru ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marco Schmidt" <mschmidt at ripe.net> To: "address-policy-wg" <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> Sent: Thursday, May 3, 2018 6:08:25 PM Subject: [address-policy-wg] 2018-01 Review Phase (Organisation-LIR Clarification in IPv6 Policy) Dear colleagues, Policy proposal 2018-01, "Organisation-LIR Clarification in IPv6 Policy" is now in the Review Phase. This proposal aims to clarify the wording used in ripe-699 regarding terms such as "organisation" and "LIR". The proposal has been updated following the last round of discussion and is now at version v2.0. Some of the differences from version v1.0 include: - Clarifies when the subsequent allocation policy applies - Fixing some typos The RIPE NCC has prepared an impact analysis on this latest proposal version to support the community’s discussion. You can find the full proposal and impact analysis at: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2018-01 And the draft documents at: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2018-01/draft As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this four week Review Phase is to continue discussing the proposal, taking the impact analysis into consideration, and to review the full draft RIPE Policy Document. At the end of the Review Phase, the WG Chairs will determine whether the WG has reached rough consensus. It is therefore important to provide your opinion, even if it is simply a restatement of your input from the previous phase. We encourage you to read the proposal, impact analysis and draft document and send any comments to <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> before 1 June 2018. Kind regards, Marco Schmidt Policy Officer RIPE NCC Sent via RIPE Forum -- https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2018-01 Review Phase (Organisation-LIR Clarification in IPv6 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2018-01 Review Phase (Organisation-LIR Clarification in IPv6 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]