This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] LACNIC "Proposal to create a Global Internet Registry (GIR)"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] LACNIC "Proposal to create a Global Internet Registry (GIR)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] LACNIC "Proposal to create a Global Internet Registry (GIR)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Lu Heng
h.lu at anytimechinese.com
Mon Mar 19 10:51:28 CET 2018
Hi On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 09:42 Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 09:08:56AM +0000, Randy Bush wrote: > > and i am less sure i want to strongly assert that the split still makes > > sense. do the regional empires really improve the operators' life? > > For an regional European operator, I certainly value being able to talk > to someone in my timezone, talk to someone who understands the way > Germans do business, etc. - read: the interaction with a regional IR > (RIPE NCC) works well for us. I am not sure if the language cultural difference between, say, Russian and Dutch are greater than British and American. As far as time zone concerned, RIPE region are crossing 8 different time zones, consider the biggest time difference you may have on the planet is 12, I am not sure that stands as well. > > "Timezone" and "cultural understanding" seem to be the important bits. > > Where the *numbers* come from, in the end, does not matter much - it > could be a global pool everyone draws from (well, it is, but we pretend > it isn't), but the local interaction is important. > > > Also, this being a policy list, being able to discuss and agree on policy > inside a region is complicated enough. Getting agreement globally on > *details* seems to be near impossible ("principles" sort of worked out). > > > > and, while indeed this is being discussed in lacnic, it does affect the > > ripe region. > > True, but since a global proposal needs to reach consensus everywhere, > we can be a bit lazy and wait to see how much momentum it gains in Lacnic, > before formally entering the discussion here... > > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster > -- > have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? > > SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann > D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) > Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 > -- -- Kind regards. Lu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20180319/de18308b/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] LACNIC "Proposal to create a Global Internet Registry (GIR)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] LACNIC "Proposal to create a Global Internet Registry (GIR)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]