[address-policy-wg] inconsistency in 2016-04

I know, but if unclear points or discrepancies are discovered in the actual stage, how we resolve them?

I understand that the PDP may have imperfections and we never realized that, not sure if it is the case.

Regards,
Jordi

-----Mensaje original-----
De: address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net> en nombre de Gert Doering <gert at space.net>
Fecha: viernes, 19 de enero de 2018, 14:23
Para: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet at consulintel.es>
CC: <address-policy-wg at ripe.net>
Asunto: Re: [address-policy-wg] inconsistency in 2016-04

    Hi,
    
    On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 02:19:54PM +0100, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg wrote:
    > What I'm saying is that, if we can't change the policy text, at least we make sure that those cases are crystal clear in the IA.
    > 
    > Or is that also breaking the PDP?
    
    The IA happens at a well-defined point in time: before the review period
    starts.
    
    Gert Doering
            -- APWG chair
    -- 
    have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
    
    SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
    Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
    D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
    Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
    



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.